|
|
Rural Health Network* |
Local Health Information Infrastructure** |
|
Organizing and development time (forming and storming) |
Time needed for getting acquainted, getting organized, discussing issues, setting goals, and making and revising plans before they any substantive action taken. Can consume time when it may appear that nothing is really happening. Process of working through real issues to reach a consensus for action HMS p 53 Important for maintaining trust between members |
Formation of a philosophical base. Discussion and decision on philosophical issues. Collaboration achieved through consensus built on sharing and trust Shared vision by members L p 13 Useful change management strategies L p 13 |
|
Legal agreement between members |
Memorandum of Understanding Alliance Agreement, |
Formal agreement to
outline: ·
Policies &
procedures ·
Practices, · Data sharing. |
|
Commitment of Leaders in Member Organizations |
Local commitment, leadership and the capacity to assign priority to multi-organizational efforts. HMS p 62 |
Strong sense of
ownership and participation in the process. Local government
support and/or involvement. |
|
Clear Mission and Objectives |
Clear program objectives Expectations Time frames Outcomes/deliverables HMS p 65 |
Establish clear
objectives Mobilized around
focused concepts There is a shared
vision, mission and the benefits for participation in the LHII |
|
Members maintain autonomy |
Functions determined by the needs of each organization rather than the converse = network exists for its participants and is designed to meet their needs. The participants don’t exist for the good of the network. p. 55 |
The LHII must be structured so that participation does
not mean the loss of power, control and/or status. L p 15 Members feel valued |
|
Organizational structure |
Bylaws describing responsibilities of members Roles of each member are clearly outlined. Members do not need to have equivalent roles. |
Clearly define roles
and responsibilities for everyone connected to the LHII. Cclear agreement on
what participation in the LHII means |
|
Management & Leadership |
Preferred leader that is not a leader of one of the members Conflict in priorities Seen as having a hidden agenda Directed by a Board of individuals representing each membership organization |
Neutral managing partner Champions of the system identified in each organization A strong leader. (A
strong physician champion/ strong entrepreneurial
guide who was not a physician.) Leadership groups/committees/task force |
|
Outside consultant |
Neutral third party |
Technical Expert |
|
Fulfills a need |
Compelling need · Survival of providers is at stake · Community left without vital services HMS p 55 |
Demonstrated importance of project to the community and member providers Community
consensus on the need for an LHII. |
|
Funding |
Sustain funding once grants run out by revenue from services provided HMS p. 62 |
Attention to financing the system—both initially and the future—to ensure success |
|
Clinical Leadership |
|
Strong physician involvement. (Physician users drive the clinical information decisions.) |
|
Communication and reporting |
|
Accurate Timely Involves all parties |
|
Assessment/evaluation |
Clear milestones with identifying responsible party Include steps on: · Organizational development · Needs assessment and planning · Service development Performance review Prescribe data collection Measures of performance to show objectives being met · Expand services · Cut costs · Improve quality · Required for continued support |
Improved quality of care and safety Efficient work flow Utilization Financial return on investment Decreasing cost of health care services |
* HMS,
A. (1995). Rural health network development: Experiences, lessons learned, and strategies. Getzville, NY:
HMS Associates.
**
Lorenzi, N. M. (2003). Strategies for creating successful local health information
infrastructure initiatives (Analysis). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt
University, Department of Biomedical Informatics.